NASRULLAH KHAN versus CHAIRMAN, AREA ELECTRICITY BOARD, WAPDA, GUJRANWALA
FR (54 (a) (b)), a civil servant who essentially retired from employment on a charge of mismanagement, filed an appeal and the appellate authority authorized him to reinstate his mandatory retirement decree. , The civil servant claimed during the rehabilitation that during the employment interruption for which he was discharged, he should have been treated as a duty payer and should be dealt with under the provisions of FR (a). , While his case was processed under FR 54 54 (b) .The mandatory retirement order was approved. It was committed and he was not given a clean chit while restoring his job so that he could be entitled to claim a cut pardon. Civil servant was not honorably discharged, subject to his provisions. No action will be taken under FIR 54 (a) and its case was properly dealt with under the provisions of FR 54 (b).
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
