Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SAIFULLAH CHEEMA versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR KAHOJA

R & 64 and Legal 65 Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act (XNXXV of Sun am33 of), Judicial Scope for Listing Appeal from the Pre-Lux Standing for Appeal Directives Re-polling Pakistan Bar Council Was not banned but instead was re-elected by the respective bar election board. The Association Appellant's Papers nomination was rejected by the Election Board and the retiring candidate was declared that the objection of the Returning Candidate against the appeal was that there was no appeal against the nomination of the Practitioners in the Legal Practitioners and Bar Councils Act, 1973. There was no clause, the appeal was not authorized and no rule was violated by R 65 (e), no appeal was made to the Pakistan Bar Councils Memorandum Association. Such request was not guaranteed. Was because the election board had declared the respondents to be elected without contest Can be called. In the case of R64, questions were appealable under the Pakistan Bar Councils Memorandum of Association, 1991 when you need a advocate from Barbar Loi lawyer