REGARDING PUTTING OF TWO GOVERNMENT OFFICERS NAMELY HASAN WASEEM AFZAL AND HIS WIFE FARKHANDA WASEEM versus
Article 184 (3) constitutional application under Article 184 (3) of the Constitution, posting of public servants, along with the rest of the previous records, as officers of the Special Duty (OSD), without any explanation, the victim of a political court In violation of the directives given by the Supreme Court, Syed Mehmood Akhtar Naqvi and others against the Federation of Pakistan and others (PLD 2013 SC 195), two senior government employees, who were officers in BS-21, were questioned. Special Duty (OSD) officer has been made since 2008 and no postings have been given to him and 2011 respectively, stating that two government employees have been hired Was sent to school but could not find one that was deferred based on special duty (OS when no performances being appointed officer D) ayuyuylysn reports (E R). Government employees in question could not get Performance Evaluation Reports (PERs) in any way, because of their posting on special duty (OSD) fighters, but it was not a law Their loss could not be ascertained under the box and no cause was given by the concerned department and for the record of such treatment, the officials did not show anything that required such treatment. ? If the past performance or integrity of public servants was below the mark of the question, they could have been treated like this but there was nothing like that they would have suffered / may not have been approved. There was an order to provide justice, which was denied to government employees due to anger and outrage.
