KANIZ FATIMA versus ZUBAIDA KHATOON
The Cantonment Rent Restriction Act, 1963 Section 2 (g) (c) of the dispute between the landlord and tenant in the dispute was transferred to the landlord, but in the records of the Cantonment Board and the Military State. The name of the landlord / conversion was not changed. The transfer of the transfer / landlord against the tenant to the officer who had been paying rent to the concerned department before transferring the landlord, was dismissed by the Controller on the ground that the transfer of record to the Cantonment Board. The house was not changed in the name of. Their title to the property exists in such a way that the landlord and tenant relationship could not be proved. The registration of the cantonment board was primarily for tax purposes so that the water and conservancy charges, the land within the cantonment tax limits. Received from the owner or resident. The Cantonment Board tenants themselves confessed that they were paying the rent of the P, after the settlement was transferred to the landlord / landlord in favor of the landlord, the landlord acquired a valuable right in the property and rented it to the tenants. The landlord and the tenant had a relationship between the parties who were entitled to recover the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Malakwal lawyer