TARIQ KURD versus RETURNING OFFICER, A.C. DHADAR
Representing Section 35 of the People's Act, 1976, irrespective of the counting equipment, the party must prove the challenger's voting allegation of a natural defect or disability of the person who voted, and to establish legal justification. Dependent content should be exposed, and no reprehensible reason should be exposed for exclusion. The final counting presiding officer has the primary responsibility of the challenger of the elector to consider the objections raised on the authenticity of any vote, irrespective of whether the aggrieved party has a disability, legal weakness or error Was bound to fundamentals when the result was ultimately stable. The officer is not available to provide evidence as to why the challenged vote could not be counted, objecting to the decision of the election request.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Poonch lawyer
