IRSHAD BIBI versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE
Article 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The High Court directed the Board of Revenue to investigate the transfer of vacant property in the first period of litigation to conduct an inquiry into the date fixed Was before the Board of Revenue. After thorough investigation and the evidence of the record and after review of the record, it was concluded that the applicant had no entitlement. The High Court made such conclusions for good reasons that the High Court documents and facts. Did not consider further and concluded that it was related to the receipt offered by the applicant. Another dilemma number and, thus, it misrepresented the facts until the petitioner was admitted in the High Court that he was not in possession of the property before the due date and the defendant. Despite his relinquishment, he dragged the defendant into litigation for more than 15 years. The findings obtained by the High Court indicated weakness or invalidity in order to reject the appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Mardan lawyer
