The trial court dismissed the trial court's dismissal of the delay in filing appeals for sections 12 and 5 of the Limitation Act, 1905, the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R1 and Section 115. The decision was announced on 14 3 1993. In this case, the date of preparation of the certified copies was taken as per the need of the time, since the appeal was required to be filed on 21 199 1993 while in fact it had 5 6 was filed on 1993 filed by the applicant in a medical petition of the private applicant's court in which the illness was reported for three days and he was prescribed medicines and rested till the fever recovers. Counsel for delayed medical plea was not issued in petition for concession 16 199 1993 Appeal to the local commissioner appointed by the trial court Judgment was signed on 23 199 1993 and it had signed its signature which the applicant has no restriction to file his appeal. 3 When he appeared before the Local Commissioner for Benefit under Section 5, Limitation Act, 1908, the delay of each day has to be specified, the Appellate Court in his present case, requesting the applicant's illness. Examine the reasons for denial of the test and the delay which the appellate court had passed in this jurisdictional order in response to the question in its appropriate jurisdiction; such an order cannot be interfered with in reviewing the appellant. The exercise of discretion by the court was not defective on any score, thus there was no interference with the amended jurisdiction, it was not guaranteed in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 1995
