GUL HASSAN versus UTILITY STORES CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD.
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) The unfair exercise charge against employees who were the general secretary of the trade union was that the union office was hired by the employee illegally by the employees Was used for his own residence. The union office raid was conducted by the FIA team headed by a magistrate and the employee found to have been used illegally when an FIR was lodged against the employee for the past 10/12 years. And the employee has been granted bail from a competent court in a criminal trial pending trial. Sheets were also presented and showcase notices were issued, under which allegations of misconduct against the employees on which the charge sheet was presented were merely allegations until it was proved in a competent court. The charge sheet presented to the employee was premature and could be just. He will be served in the criminal court employer after a pending trial decision, so he has been prevented from dismissal / expulsion / expulsion or final judgment in a criminal case pending trial in a criminal court. Until then, the employee was ordered to issue a show cause notice to be removed from his job so that he could remain suspended until a competent court decision.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
