MUHAMMAD SARWAR SHAKIR versus PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION
Section 4 (1) Appeal limitation A public servant whose prior claim for grant of a surrender was rejected by the competent authority had to file an appeal before the tribunal within 30 days, but the public servant instead applied for one year. After a long time, the Prime Minister filed a petition. His claim was rejected and such a request was repeatedly dismissed. After the application was rejected, the civil servant did not file an appeal before the service tribunal and continued the representation and correspondence and finally filed the appeal before the service tribunal more than a year and a half later. His claim was rejected, which explicitly banned public servants from time to time who failed to file an appeal before the service tribunal within the stipulated period, filing their petition before the prime minister. And the subsequent rejection and correspondence was at its own risk and cost and could not be extended over time for the purpose of being limited. Appeals were filed by public servants who are clearly on time as the rejection could be dismissed on the basis of limitation, especially when such delays in filing an appeal by a government employee were reliable circumstances. Failed to deliver
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
