Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus PROVINCE OF THE PUNJAB

The Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 188 Supreme Court Rules 1980, OXV, R1 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), the groundwork for reviewing the decision of Section 3 Supreme Court was that once the court reached its conclusion In its judgment that the application for relief claim was sought by the plaintiff in the law case, it should not be denied, the court reviewed in its judgment that between 1946 and 1977 Was not occupied and was completely unaware. In addition to the possession of the property and property of others who have claimed it on their own, for any reason since 1977, they cannot claim for any reason and under such Can claim its relief within the limits of claiming relief. There is no known principle of law in 1963 under which the restoration of the cause of action on the termination of the full available period of termination of the ban and the period of limitation during the aga, either from the date of knowledge or rent. The acquisition of the holders may take place only on acquisition or acquisition, so the court did not conclude that the legal plane was not shown open for question. In the circumstances there was no case for review. advocate for immigration from Chaghi lawyer