MUHAMMAD SANAULLAH versus RANIPUR CONSOLIDATED SUGAR MILLS LIMITED, RANIPUR
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (3) (e) Employee Rejected Employee, who was dismissed after notice and absent from duty due to misconduct. But an inquiry was held against him. For more than ten days, he claimed that he had applied for leave for 11 days to the Assistant Accountant (who was not the authorized authority) because the manager was on leave that day, to extend the leave, to the employee. Claimed to have sent a phone call to try to extend it, but was unsuccessful. The lagged leave request was unreachable and was not presented to a court phone for a holiday extension, which the manager Could not be found to contact, could not be considered as an alternative to the application. The leave extension employee who failed to prove that he had applied for leave regularly was found to have been absent without proper leave for more than ten days and on this ground Seriously dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Dir lawyer
