REHMAT NOOR versus GHULAM MUHAMMAD
The Special Relief Act 1877 Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), the concurrent results of the courts below Section 115 Revision Scope, whether a declaration and a revocation suit for possession may be interfered with by the plaintiffs claiming that, based on the gift, Have become the owners of the land under question. (Adj.) Such claims by defendant's predecessor did not prove on record for declaration of gift, neither gift approval nor transfer of possession of underground land was claimed by the plaintiff. And the oral gift was established by the plaintiff to seize the property. The doctrine of the deprivation of the deceased's legal heirs had failed unsuccessfully by presenting contradictory evidence as a gift. Will not guarantee interference [Muhammedan Law]
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Deh Pathaan lawyer
