Find a Lawyer

FIDA HUSSAIN versus THE SECRETARY, KASHMIR AFFAIRS AND NORTHEN AFFAIRS DIVISION

Rules of the Supreme Court Order of the 1980 Pakistan Engineering Council Act (V5 1975), Sections 2 and 8 of Pakistan (1973), Arts 25, 212 and 188 of the Supreme Court Rules, 1980, AXXVI, R1 Review of the decision of the Supreme Court Civil The government had started two degree courses for Diploma holders in Engineering, namely B Tech (pass) and B Tech (Honors), in favor of publicity because of the improvement in the qualification of the employees, the applicant passed both such exams. And claimed development on the basis of their superior abilities. It was not promoted on the basis that the Pakistan Engineering Council did not recognize BTech (Hons) against the BCC Engineering Degree Petitioner's appeal and appeal before the service tribunal failed, the Supreme Court applied. Dismissed the appeal of The service tribunal was based on the Supreme Court decision in the Mohammad Siddique Nasim case (1987 SCMR 302) (revision) demanding the government introduce diploma holder engineers to the B Tech (Pass) and B Tech (Hons) degree courses. Facilitation will be facilitated to improve their qualifications, and a later degree will be considered equivalent to a BC engineering degree. An important aspect of the development of the B-17 grade that escaped notice in its decision under the Supreme Court review was that some other government employees / employees were also placed in the same position as the applicant. Grades were considered to be promoted and in fact they were promoted when the applicant was denied benefits which, under review, violated Article 25 of the Constitution. , The appeal was granted for processing wrong premises and the service tree online advocate from Hattar lawyer