Find a Lawyer

WARIS ALI versus THE STATE

Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 426 (1A) (C) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), section 302 (c) of the appeal pending the punishment for the suspension of the sentence Was not towards death. The complainant had confessed to his enmity with the accused and had passed a legal term of two years and it is still not possible to hear the accused's appeal against his conviction and conviction. Was admitted and was admitted as guaranteed

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 1995

• PETER JOHN SAHOTRA v. RETURNING OFFICER 1995 CLC 687
• SHAH DIN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 688
• NIAZ BEGUM v. WARIS KHAN 1995 MLD 690
• QAISER ABBAS v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 693
• CH. SHUJAAT HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1995 PCRLJ 696
• ABDUL QADIR v. MUHAMMAD ARSHAD 1995 MLD 699
• NISHAT MILLS LTD v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 1995 PLC 700
• THE STATE THROUGH FEDERAL INVESTIGATION AGENCY S.I.U., ISLAMABAD v. CH. SHUJAAT HUSSAIN 1995 PCRLJ 701

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 1995 →

advocates from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes