Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

RAUF AHMAD versus WALAYAT BEGUM


West Pakistan Citizens Rent Ordinance 1959 Sections 13 (2) (i) and (6) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) new application depending on the nature of the legal objection regarding the interpretation of the provisions of section 13. Was. The tenancy that will be available, only in the case of oral tenancy when the objection to the nature of the tenancy was first raised at the hearing of the leave application for appeal to the Supreme Court and the written statement was not raised at all. Was. In response to the request under Section 13 (6), nor before the rent controller, Additional District Judge and the High Court, not only was this appeal not made in the leave appeal, as it was not There was no legal legal objection. , But based on the fact that the tenancy was oral, the petitioner cannot be allowed to raise such an objection before the Supreme Court for the first time.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
best law firm from Sialkot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.