Find a Lawyer

CANTONMENT BOARD versus SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB

Punjab Town Improvement Act 1922 Section 103 Municipal Administration Ordinance (X of 1960), Section 25 Cantonment Act (II of 1924), Section 3 with the direction of dissolving the trust of improvement by the Provincial Government that all the related municipal committees and all such assets and Will take the liability to you. Trust and carry out his duties. Some areas were included in the cantonment limits of this area. On the dissolution of the Environment Trust, the Cantonment Board claimed ownership of all the properties previously owned by the Enforcement Trust but were under the jurisdiction of the Cantonment Board and after the dissolution the claim of the Cantonment Board to be valid. The confidence in the ownership of the property in question was completely eradicated. Such properties were originally owned by the Investment Trust and the dissolution of the property is with the Municipal Committee, which has jurisdiction over the supply of section 103. 2) The Punjab Town Improvement Act, 1922, publishes that one of the effects of the dissolution was whether the properties, funds and liabilities owed by the trust were to be obtained by the relevant municipal committee cantonment board. Therefore, cannot claim ownership. Properties in dispute Although the Cantonment Board had administrative control over the area within its jurisdiction, it cannot claim to own the properties that the local authority had previously owned. lawer from fb area from Warah lawyer