Find a Lawyer

PERVEZ ELLAHI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN

Pakistan Panel Code Section 420/468/471/477 A / 109 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Before cutting FIR prosecution on constitutional request Documents as well as oral evidence were available to prove false allegations leveled against the accused by the Sugar Mill of the accused by the association of the same officials of the banking institutions case and the result of the fraud was investigated and the law. In this case did not allow the investigation process to stop. The police denied the right to investigate the matter, even after recording the evidence of Malala's investigation by the accused, which could prove that a constitutional petition is still pending.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 1995

• EHSANULLAH TARAR v. GUL NAWAZ WARAICH 1995 PLD 602
• IFTIKHAR AHMAD ALIAS DANI v. THE STATE 1995 PLD 606
• SHAH BEHRAM v. THE STATE 1995 PLD 610
• SARWAR ALI v. STATE 1995 MLD 614
• NIAZ ALI v. MUHAMMAD SADIQ 1995 PLD 617
• MUHAMMAD RASHEED v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, BAHAWALPUR 1995 CLC 622
• MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. TABEY HUSSAIN 1995 PCRLJ 625
• MUHAMMAD JAMIL v. TABEY HUSSAIN 1995 MLD 625

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 1995 →

criminal advocate from Dandot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes