All the witnesses of the prosecution appreciated the Section 13 evidence of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965. A private person was not added to witness the arrest and recovery proceedings despite the availability, although the arrest and retrieval of the detective's information. It was done during the day, yet there was no advisor. Even defensive evidence was denied regarding the raiding operation in the village, nor to arrest the accused nor to suppress the activities of the terrorists (Special Courts) to meet the provisions of section 8. Recovery was established from Act (XV of 1975) so as to increase the burden of proof so that the accused was shifted the accused was acquitted under the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
