The Sindh Tenant Premises Ordinance 1979, in its cross-examination as well as the fact of paying the rent in its oath by the tenants' landlord, had admitted that the rent had been sent to them by the tenant's lawyer. After that he did not receive the same tenant, he had submitted the rent in rent. The controller's court could not prove a default in payment of rent without interruption. The facts of the rent payment by the landlord in his affidavit, as well as the scrutiny, were acknowledged by the tenant's lawyer who sent him the rent but he was the same tenant thereafter. Did not receive the rent after which the rent was submitted to the Controller's Court, the payment of rent without interval was not proved in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
