MUHAMMAD AZAM versus STATE
Section 497 (2) Offense Hood (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10/13/14 Bail, Grant that all the accused retaliated with adultery when there were witnesses outside the house The door to open that he received Rs 500 from the women did not necessarily mean that he was sent by the accused for the purpose of stating the facts of the adultery was found guilty under section 14 of the offense of adultery in the FIR. Had not happened (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979, therefore, required further investigation into the crime of the accused, which is why the accused was allowed to bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Abbottabad lawyer
