PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus ABDUL QADEER
Article 2 (xxviii), 35, 37, 25A & 38 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, Article Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Labor Appellate Tribunal and the Order of the Labor Courts are subject to the jurisdiction of the High Court. After the court, the Labor Courts and the Appellate Tribunal High Court will require that when a complaining employee is not in the service of employment, he is awaiting a verdict in the Appeal Section 2 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance Dictum. (xxviii) employees will not be appreciated. The Labor Court's order against the workers' retirement was challenged before the Appellate Tribunal Appellate Tribunal in its appeal to retain the labor court's merit, but it was determined that the Labor Court had no jurisdiction. Was, after the High Court Labor Appellate Tribunal's rule, appeal with the instruction that if the Supreme Court decided that persons who were not in service at the time of filing a complaint, section 2 (xxviii) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 The dismissal, by the definition of worker given in, shall be equivalent to the dismissal of the present appeal
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
