Find a Lawyer

BILQUIS ISMAIL versus NAEEMUDDIN

Civil Procedure Code Order VII (V of 1908), VII, R 10 of the CPC Plants Sections 5 and 6, Ordinance of the West Pakistan Civil Courts (II of 1962), Section 7 [as amended (amended) by the Sindh Civil Courts (Ordinance (VII VI of 1991)] The newly created MM in the Karachi Division, in the petition of the defendants in the High Court, has stated that the judgment of the plaintiff is pending before the High Court. To be returned and after the formation of the M district. , The High Court had no provision for the jurisdiction of Section 7, West Pakistan Civil Courts Ordinance, 1962, which was amended by Ordinance VII of 1991 which stated that in the civil suit, from Rs. The High Court shall have the exclusive jurisdiction of the majority. The Karachi District Term is not used in reference to the Karachi District or Division, but instead the term Karachi District was used twice which expresses the intention of the legislature that they charged. Karachi, not as a district, but as a number of districts that created the new District M, has to hold a more controversial jurisdiction than the legal jurisdiction in the District Judge M and to issue a more controversial jurisdiction. Cannot exclude term of Karachi District suit. Appeal for the return of the plaintiffs to the applicants before the District Judge MM was dismissed in the circumstances list of supreme court advocates from Killa Saifullah lawyer