Find a Lawyer

JANUARIO MUNES versus SINDH LABOUR APPELLATE- TRIBUNAL, KARACHI

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Sections Oz 15 (2) (iv) and 15 (3) (a) (b) termination of services Employee who was absent from the relevant day duty, moved the application the next day. ? The result was that he was suffering from stomach upset and prayed for a day off because of illness. One of the employee's top officers learned that the employee had actually appeared on the relevant day in an interview for another job, the employee was charged and independent of the charge sheet and was found guilty of corruption. Services were terminated from employment that had been absent from the relevant day duty without prior permission, seeking a grant of leave on a land which he could not confirm. From his presence at another bank that day to appearing for an interview at another bank in connection with a claim for stomach ache and a person suffering from stomach ache and claiming to be unable to attend his service. Opposed to. Ice could not attend any other bank to appear in an interview The employee has not only repeatedly made false statements, the effect of which he did not appear for the interview but has also been making allegations against his superiors. Who exposed her lies. The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968 was abolished in accordance with the provisions of Sections O15 KCL (A) and (B), which dealt with corruption in its case. ask a advocate free from Ghuzdar lawyer