Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus WAPDA

R2 (3) Mandatory Retirement Employee who had been working as a Met Reader in the Authority, retired from the job after issuing it, so the notices show that he was in relation to various electricity users. Failed to produce the relevant card which has damaged the authority civil. Qualification, which must have retired from employment by a competent authority under R2 (3) of the Rules, 1978, claimed that the rules under which he retired were not legal norms. The action taken under the law is unlawful for a public servant. In view of the fact that the Supreme Court in its latest decision on 28 199 1994 authorized the authority to take action against its employees under these rules. best advocate from Kotla Jam lawyer