SINDH AGRICULTURAL SUPPLIES ORGANISATION (SASO), HYDERABAD versus RAZA MUHAMMAD KORAI
Section 4 Exemption of civil servant misconduct and allegations of corruption. The prosecuting officer was given the opportunity to examine the witnesses by the inquiry officer, but did not appear before the inquiry officer to inspect the witnesses, although he was present at the office on fixed dates. The attendance register in which he signed his presence was given to the public servant a full opportunity to respond to the showcase notice and a personal hearing was conducted before the authority passed a final order against him. Did not take advantage of such opportunities, and chose to stay. An unofficial government employee admitted to the inquiry officer himself that he had recorded his confessional statement regarding the allegations; no further inquiry or showcase notice was required in the presence of other witnesses and staff of the office establishment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Harnai lawyer