Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

QADIR BAKHSH versus THE STATE


Sections 13 (d) of the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975 and 3 of the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Schedule, CL (C) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 103 A single barrel of Kalashnikov's gun and cartridge allegedly recovered from the suspect, no doubt, came in praise of the weapons provided in section 3 of the West Pakistan Arms Ordinance, 1965, but they were dropped in the aforementioned weapons category. did not come. In the CL (C) Schedule of Terrorism Activities (1976) Act, 1976, and therefore the special court had no jurisdiction to hear the case only through a common court of the First Class Magistrate Police Officer. There was a hearing. Any attempt to subdue the private persons to the recovery proceedings, however, may be done in violation of the provisions of Section 103, CCPC under such circumstances: = The accused has been acquitted in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocates from Naukot lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.