MUHAMMAD TARIQ MANZOOR versus MUHAMMAD AHMAD
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 324/337A (i) (iii) / 452/148/149 Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Sections 202, 203 and 204 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Magistrate After finding the preliminary evidence against the accused after filing preliminary evidence in the complaint, he has been summoned by the Sessions Court, in whose jurisdiction to review, he rejects the magistrate's order which led to the verification of medical evidence. Conflicts with the evidence. Under section 202 (1), the CCP was only a preliminary inquiry to determine the truth and falsity of the allegations in the complaint and to make a regular decision in relation to the Sessions Court accused in relation to the Medico Legal Report. Not Trial Since the Mido Legal Report was not yet a piece of evidence and the opinion expressed in the doctor's case was nothing but prejudice to the complainant, the prosecution could not be prosecuted against the accused magistrate. The Sessions Court dismissed the complaint in a review for not violating the law. The Sessions Court Magistrate should have directed further investigation in light of the above meadow. The order to dismiss the complaint of the Legal Report Sessions Court was put aside in the circumstances and accordingly the constitutional petition was accepted.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Gaggo Mandi lawyer