Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUSTAFA versus THE STATE

Five investigating officers, including Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) section 497 panel code (XLV of 1860), section 302/324/452/34 bail, three D section P, found the accused innocent 6 Investigating officers were found guilty of the crime. A D-section P had found them to be the actual culprits, which was enough to bail them out. An accused was arrested on a burglary case for obtaining a confessional statement only after the motive. Was dismissed from the trial. The confessional statement of Magistrate Syed, whose true value has yet to be determined by the trial court, could not stand on the charge of release on bail and was kept in the vacancy of the offenses recovered from the occasion. After his confessional statement he was served and remanded to police remand. The police station was not presented to the court for eight months without being sent to a forensic science laboratory. Dialogue Two years ago, the report of the forensic science laboratory about the vacancy of the crime and the firearms sent to them were still awaited, despite the delay of almost 14 months, the accused was admitted on bail. pakistani advocates Chowk Maitla lawyer