Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AJMAL versus ZAHID SHAKOOR

Appealing against the fate of the accused under the Pakistan Penal Code Section 304, Part I Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Section 302, the PPC High Court had reviewed the evidence that the accused did not come to the proper armed position. And was used to wound the weapon through it. The victim was not a weapon of crime, but a device (crank) was usually used to cut fodder and injuries to both sides. The incident was not disturbed and it was followed by a sudden fight in the heat of passion. It matters. The defendant's land reserves did not repeat the blow, nor did he take any advantage, nor did he act in a cruel or unusual manner, so, on the charge of murdering the victim was a criminal murder. The charge was not murder. The cause of death of the deceased though he knew that the injury could have resulted from his death, so the crime committed by the accused is punishable under section 304, PPC and under this No Section 2302, PPC and it was punished by the High Court, there was insufficient appeal against the conviction of the accused under Section 302; the PPC was dismissed by the High Court accordingly. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Nowshera lawyer