KALIM versus THE STATE
Section 497 Sanctions of the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975, 43 435/147/148/109 Supports the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), Section 8 bail I had committed the alleged act when he himself would remove it from the privileges of bail. Due to the absence of grounds in favor of the accused, the law of consistency did not apply, which guarantees the accused (a) The accused's name was in the EI. R and it was pointed out on the spot, the burden of proving his innocence regarding the provisions of Article 8 of the Suppression of Terrorism (Special Courts) Act, 1/9/15. Increased - The bail was denied to the accused in the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocates from Gilgit lawyer