KARIM KHAN versus GATRON (INDUSTRIES) LTD., HUB
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O13 Returns Employees have accused employees of working as a driver in the company's transportation department for termination of their employment, which was called retrenchment. Was styled, was illegal and had to work with a company employing illegal jobs. The employees' rehabilitation notes detailed the circumstances in which employees were required to terminate the working transport section. Employees stated that a contract was necessary for the rehabilitation of employees in the exercise of the legal right to regulate internal affairs of company officials / employees. It is fully established on the record that the employees' retirement was made in accordance with the seniority list and the requirements of the law. No driver was hired by the employees but then the employees were being transported by the transport contractor's vehicles and the employees were offered employment by the transport contractor, but he said Employees could not take advantage of this opportunity and close the transport section and provide transportation to personnel / workers. The contracting company was neither illegal nor can it be held to account for the fact that the management has to regulate its affairs or change the administrative administration or take into account its resources and current or future needs. There was considerable authority to recognize the trade organization. In addition to the facts, the employer may use the Company
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer