Find a Lawyer

FIAZ TRADING CORPORATION versus WAPDA

CPC Adjustments OXVII, Rr 1 (3) 3, and Civil Procedure Code Order XVII of Section 115 Trial Court, pending the issue of recording of the claimant's statement after refusing to postpone it under O XVII, R 3. The rest of your evidence is the option to close the trial court. The CPC was required to decide the case immediately, while under OXVII, R1 (3), the CPC had to carry on the suit course adopted by the trial court under which it sought further. The evidence refused to postpone the case but at the same time the adjournment case was not taken by any of the provisions, namely, O XVII, R 3 or O XVII, R 1 (3). , The CPC trial court could not close the remaining evidence of the plaintiff and, having acted under the auspices of the trial court, it was set aside and the plaintiff supported his case on his final assignment. M Who was also one of the last and final opportunity to present it to the evidence, it was unable to prove that it will be closed. advocates from Talhur lawyer