MUHAMMAD HANIF versus HABIB CREDIT AND EXCHANGE BANK LIMITED, KARACHI
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 2 (xxviii) and the 25 job placement complaints filed against the dismissal were dismissed on the grounds that their complaints were not enforceable because the employees were not employees. The employees themselves admitted in their interim examination that they were working at the bank in the capacity of officers drawing drawings of over Rs 12,000 and that they received huge sums from the bank as car loans and housing loans. Employees also acknowledged that returns made by other employees and typed in by the officer Check as status. Employees who were found to be neither laborers nor performing manual or manual duties, but were found to be officers of the bank, their grievance requests were not viable and the Labor Court rejected their complaint requests. Right Deleted
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
patent advocate from Quetta lawyer