RAZIA ZAHIR versus MUHAMMAD KAMIL QURESHI
The Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 was on the tenant determined in section 10 and 15 (2) (ii) to pay the rent that it had to disclose before the ordinance rented the tenant as required under section 10. He offered the rent. The landlord and this was when the landlord refused to rent, he could resort to other methods of payment of rent, by taking a tender through a money order or submitting it to the court as mentioned in the contract. Was not possible, and it was not possible for the tenant to receive the landlord's rent initially as required under Section 10 of the Ordinance Tenant, under the circumstances, on any money which could be found It was legitimate to benefit from other means by sending. Accepting the rent at the address given to the landlord, he could resort to a third way by submitting it to the court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of supreme court advocates from Qambar lawyer
