Find a Lawyer

ADMINISTRATOR AUQAF, HYDERABAD versus ALLAN FAKIR

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 Civil Reconstruction Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (b) rehabilitation work in the departmental department challenged the termination of employment by the department. The employee was appointed as a servant (caretaker), was neither an industrial nor a trade firm employing more than 20 persons, but was a government department and the employee was a public servant and was employed in section 2 of the Industrial Relations Ordinance (xxviii). ) Was not a worker. 1969 or the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance (VII of 1968), under the circumstances, the Labor Court had no jurisdiction to hear complaints filed by public servants that were public under the meaning of the Civil Servants Act, 1973. Was an employee. property advocates from Patoki lawyer