Find a Lawyer

ALLAH BAKHSH versus ABDUL REHMAN

Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 35 Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), O VII, R 11 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Request for dismissal of the plaintiff's plea before dismissing the case 1 8 1986 to 28 3 During the period referred to in Section 35, Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991, 1991, the former discrimination was not filed, the same (case) was not reserved, such petition was rejected by the trial court that the trial case was rejected. Was. Protected by section 35, the trial court's finding under the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1991 was confirmed by the High Court's endorsement, for the execution of the services of ONI, R11, in such cases. In the above, the houses included in the CPC shall be considered as valid plant. The assumption should be investigated and if the case falls under any provision of R 11 of CPC, R11, the reason for the plaintiff's contention will be that the miracle is rejected, and no reason can be ascertained. Neither this claim was claimed that its value was not deducted f It failed to correct the price despite the court's appointed time or that the plaintiff's paper was written on insufficient stamp paper and the plaintiff's court Failed to deliver the required stamp paper within the timeframe specified by, or was prevented by the claimant by anyone in this case. Thus, the trial court dismissed that the High Court had rejected the petitions related to the dismissal of the case. ask a advocate free from Fateh Pur lawyer