PAKISTAN RAILWAYS versus JAVED IQBAL
The trial court ruled that the plaintiff's legacy was exempt from the plaintiff's legacy due to an accident caused by the railway engine liability for the constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), but the first appeal It was rejected by the Court High Court. However, the trial court's decision and order restored and the legitimate facts awarded with interest interest and the circumstances of the case indicated that no legal questions of general importance were raised in the case, the defendant admitted. The train suffered an injury on the track, leading to a lawsuit. The High Court also found that this question arose because of the negligence of the plaintiffs of the Railway employees, even though it did not take any interest. The amount of damages awarded does not appear to have been paid to the plaintiff; no interference in the judgment and order of the High Court was guaranteed. Appeal was denied before the circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from More kunda lawyer
