Find a Lawyer

ROSHAN versus STATE

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Arts 199 and 185 (3) Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), O IX, R 9 Application for re-hearing / re-hearing of constitutional application, such as rejection of five-year delays. To delete The claim of inadmissibility in support of the application for rehabilitation / practice was vague in nature and in fact false. There was no good reason for filing such an application after a delay of five years. To file an application for reinstatement after his constitutional application is dismissed, cannot be disclosed. If this claim was true then the petition for reinstatement was not filed after five years, no ground was prepared for the restoration of the constitutional petition; the High Court had exercised its jurisdiction in rejecting such request. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Mehar lawyer