MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Section 23 Post Rules, 1984, RR 2, 4 and 5 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 1974), Section 47 post-appellant and the defendants are held in different positions in BPS 17. Appointment of Defendant was challenged by the Appellant before the Service Tribunal, but without any effect, the Validity Authority appealed that the appointment of the Defendant at the upgrade post was not a final order, it was merely an ad hoc appointment order. Also it was not stated that this is temporary. There is no concept of a permanent or temporary appointment, by the nature or arrangement of a stop gap; a public servant assigned to a high-grade position in his or her salary and scale is entitled to the salary-related rules set for a position or grade. Will be. For a position or rank where a public servant was appointed to a higher position, he held the position and exercised greater authority, and the man y people who had the same salary and scale would pay for it. Subordinates will be employed and in some cases senior persons may also be appointed to serve as appellants. In addition they were more qualified and had more experience with the technical branch than the respondents in the relevant field. And thus, a depressed person and post has been entitled to consider respondents' appointments. Has insulted mode, as a result it was decided that the issue would be left to the post office in question the authority of law.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
