MUHAMMAD LATIF KHAN versus SARWAR HUSSAIN
Sections 44 and 47 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunals Act, 1975, Section 4 jurisdiction for the promotion of public servants, all orders relating to the terms and services, whether approved with or without jurisdiction, service. Will appear before the Tribunal once the jurisdiction was banned. Indirect or indirect, especially through a constitutional clause, the clause of the outlaw will be absolute and thereby no leave or alteration was allowed under the law. It is understood that the High Court may succeed in this matter. Assume jurisdiction, even if such a case was within the jurisdiction of the Service Tribunal, Article 4 would have been freely provided, in the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Service Tribunals Act 1975, the authority to order in relation to any terms and conditions and Nor does it have the effect of placing a condition whereby the authority must be able to pass a proper order in which it may be appealed to file an order for which the terms and conditions of liberal import are, Limited construction that includes the liberal interpretation of the departmental authority as such, any authority that may be included in any of the terms In this case, the order was passed and the terms in this case were restricted by the High Court's jurisdiction in this case, the development of a public servant, which is related to the terms and conditions of service.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Swat lawyer