Find a Lawyer

PROPRIETOR, AMREEN GLASS BANGLES INDUSTRIES, HYDERABAD versus JAN MUHAMMAD

West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, sections O11 and 13 of the 1968 Retirement Employees were relieved first and were paid wages for a maximum period of 14 days and thereafter There was no re-employment given that the employer had closed the gas supply / factory and the stock had accumulated. Later, the employers wrote in accordance with section 11 (3) of the West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance. Employees were routinely terminated; employees alleged that the factory was not closed for reasons. was done. It was run by employers but under different names. That workers other than employees continue to work in the factory. The termination order was bad because in relation to the provision of section O13 of the ordinance, the employers did not follow the process of retrenchment as most of the employees were not discharged, but only agitated employees. Was deprived of his job and was eventually granted permission to close. The factory work was not organized by the Labor Court, the employees were terminated indefinitely, there was no question of their recovery, dismissal of employees under Section 11 (3). Cannot be questioned if they are paid the full right within 15 days from the date of termination of their employment, including notice pay and grants, if the employees feel that the name of the factory has been changed and If the factory closure is without the prior permission of the Labor Court, they seek treatment separately family advocate from Multan lawyer