Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD SHOAIB versus MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM

Petition for leave to appeal against the High Court order passed in Article 58 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 185 (3) and 1996 Constitutional Jurisdiction. The fact is that the mortgage of the parties of the constitutional revival land agreed that the leaseholder would cultivate the land on a certain amount of puppies each year to recover the monopoly amount. In the case of a suit, there is a compromise between the parties under which the mortgagee agrees to pay the mortgage a certain amount by the due date, in which case it fails. The mortgage over the mortgage claim claimed that the unanimous amount was not paid to him and as such, he is entitled to take possession of the land under question. Was received and the payment receipt was not confirmed. Whether it is through the Assistant Political Agent but also through the Mortgage Question Lawyer whether the Special Counsel was the author, the mortgagee is willing to receive this amount and whether or not he was legally constituted a lawyer. Under the constitutional jurisdiction, the High Court could not have gone before that any weakness of the High Court decision was not indicated in the circumstances. advocates from Mirpur Khas lawyer