Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

GLAXO LABORATORIES OF PAKISTAN LTD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN


Sales Tax Act 1951 Section 28 Central Excise Rules, 1944, Rule 10 and 210 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Demanding Sales Tax from Applicants on Their Products \ Diable Loan Sales ??????? Are claiming The petitions were also rejected through the forums below, and the questions raised in support of the sales tax exemption were in fact the differences between the two government departments, which required scrutiny by the Supreme Court. Had raised the question of law. That there was a dispute of views in the High Court on this question. And that the authorities improperly pressed R-10, the Central Excise Rules in 1944, and the relevant section for the alleged claim for payment was Section 28, the Sales Tax Act, 1951, requiring examiners to leave the appeal in the circumstances. Was approved.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.