Find a Lawyer

MUSHTAQ AHMAD versus DIRECTOR (SEED), GHEE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD., LAHORE

R 7 Rule of Business, R 5 (14) The public servant's publicity in BPS 21 was approved by the Prime Minister on informational advisory notes, but since the issue of public servant was processed through the normal selection board of the Central Selection Board. Not what was needed. The rules, no notification regarding such development was issued, while the co-public servants, who were regularly recommended by the Central Selection Board, were approved by the competent authority Establishment Division, I was in a jurisdiction to identify violations of the law, rule or policy. The Ministry of Information has to review its case as its case was not dealt with by the Central Selection Board's common channel and was a gross violation of the rules on which a Government employee challenged such a reference. That his promotion by the Prime Minister was done under special circumstances, that his progress should have been applied without any objection to the procedure of appointment and according to the publication of a public servant under R7 of the P rules, the law Was required to implement the development of a public servant in BPS 19 through BPS 19 and through the Central Selection Board. Witt and otherwise be made in any development can not be properly developed. According to the law, the relevant rules of public employee advertisement were violated at BPS 21, the matter was properly referred to the Tea Authority by the Establishment Division. immigration advocates phone number from Pindi bhohri lawyer