EXECUTIVE FNRINEER, HALA TUBE WELL DIVISION versus ABDUL SATTAR
Section 11 (1) (i) Termination of employment The public servant to whom the appointment was made was recommended under the terms and conditions of the Federal Public Service Commission, which was accepted by the public servant at the time of joining. It was kept under scrutiny for a year for which it was further expanded. Another period of one year was terminated under section 11 (1) (i) of the Public Employee Services Act during this employment; without any notice the performance and satisfactory satisfactory record of the public servant was obtained by the competent authority. Was. He was upset and had an unusual attitude about his service. The civil servant was a late comer, which led to several warnings in writing and such negative entries were also sent to him during that period. Were listed in the CR but the government employee did not improve despite several warnings on initial appointment. To prove their suitability in service through the service and consider this period as a trial period It used to be that if a public servant did not try to improve himself during the initial trial period, he would have to face the consequences according to the conditions. The terms of service of which public servants, failing to improve themselves during the initial probationary period, terminate their services without notice, under section 11 (1) (i) of the Act. Was done.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates from Lakimarwat lawyer