Find a Lawyer

MOHSIN SHAH versus QASEEMA WAHID

West Pakistan Family Court Rules 1965 R 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 203 and 1993 Under the jurisdiction of the High Court, the trial proceedings separated the former parties proceedings under Article 199, Constitution Pakistan (1973). Reject the request to keep. The dismissal applicant, who was a Lieutenant Colonel in the Army, stated in his plea that his absence was not intentional but at the time he was stationed in areas that were areas of special circumstances, therefore, They could not be personally presented. That his lawyer went abroad to pursue higher education and for that reason he could not even appear and when he learned of the previous proceedings, he had moved the petition to keep the same hold, After the trial court was given the wrong decision to decide the petition. Arguing, especially when the same applicant was urged that he could not get leave on those days and some explanation was given, he deserved the opportunity to prove his justification by fixing matters only and guiding the parties. Can be allowed to do so. The evidence and the application can only be decided on the occasion that the applicant can be certified whatever the cost of the application is, to prove the applicant wrong before dismissing the application by the trial court. Should have provided the opportunity. Therefore, the untimely order was illegal, with no legal authority and the jurisdiction under which the jurisdiction was set aside. ticle203 constitution of pakistan attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Thul lawyer