Find a Lawyer

HAMID QAYYUM versus MUHAMMAD AZEEM

Law Evidence Order 1984 Article 59 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Appeal of the Supreme Court suit for the specific performance of a contract to sell the property and execute a forged signature of a sales contract Other relevant documents in the handwriting expert's opinion and the subsequent findings of the three courts together were that the signatures do not contain counterfeit real estate fraud and that there are wild allegations of fraud, the Supreme Court compared the signatures. Recommended. With the help of virtual car glasses and the reasons presented by the expert, it was understandable and convincing that the fact of the seller's three bottom forums about the truth of the seller's contract revealed the reality of reality. There was no legal weakness, misreading or non-reading. Evidence Supreme Court denies interference in appeal famous lower court advocate from Matli lawyer