ABDUL SATTAR BHUTTO versus PAKISTAN CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY
Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional jurisdiction exercised by the Government Employees who were selected for the post of Assistant Communications Officer, were sent in two batches for the training of the civil servant in the second of the two batches. Sent was challenged to send. While filing the constitutional petition, the candidates alleged that sending candidates in two batches and sanctioning these candidates was a violation of the service rules of the Authority under section 12 of the Ordinance 1982. Its officers, employees, specialists and consultants and their terms and conditions of service The Government did not reserve the authority to regulate the terms of service of the employees of the Authority, but by giving them the authority to set rules. It was left at the discretion of the authority. Toretti was a master and a servant in this case for this support of government intervention without government service and intervention, and the treatment of a public servant accused of violating service rules was to file a lawsuit for such relief. Could have been provided, but their treatment was not available to them through constitutional petition.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Tarnol lawyer