Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

versus


Sales Tax Act 1990 Section 36 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 therefore, dismissed the appeal against tax evasion against the tax notice which led to the applicant's case having already been decided by the federal government. During the preliminary litigation period, the High Court did not hold jurisdiction over such appeal, stating that the appeal filed by the applicant would be considered pending before the Collector and thereafter the Collector. Would, therefore, simply not be able to refuse to hear the petitioner's appeal. On the basis that in the first round of litigation, the review petition filed by the applicant was decided by a federal government case, which remanded the collector to the merit decision and the decision on the question of jurisdiction of the deputy collector. The remand for the hearing was obtained.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
law firms from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.