PROVINCE OF PUNJAB versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR AND COMPANY
A. XLI, R1 Demarcation Act (IX of 1908), Delays in filing Appeals 3, 5 and 14 were initially filed before the District Judge on November 12, 1992; Returned to it in January 1993. He had no legal jurisdiction to hear and appeal the same appeal. Thereafter, the period between January 24, 1993 and February 16, 1993, was not satisfactorily explained in the High Court on February 16, 1993. There was no justification for not filing an appeal. It was returned by the District Judge, the time taken in obtaining a copy of the District Judge's order cannot be excluded because a copy of that order was not absolutely necessary for filing an appeal, otherwise the order dated 2 199 1993. After obtaining the copy, the appellants were so negligent in filing an appeal before the High Court that there was a further delay of 14 days, for which there was no plausible explanation on the record, but every day it sought further condolences. Doing so must clearly and adequately define the boundary period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
